Urol. praxi. 2018;19(4):162-167 | DOI: 10.36290/uro.2018.079

Current surgical treatment options of pelvic organ prolapse

MUDr. Miroslav Krhovský
Urologické oddělení Nemocnice Kyjov

The last 25 years witnessed great changes in the reconstructive surgical procedures on the female pelvic floor. This development hadpredominantly been spurred on by an increasing number of relapses after traditional surgery had been performed. Positive results thatwere accomplished while using the mesh in laparoscopic hernia and stress incontinence surgeries also built a foundation for implantingthe mesh in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. As a result, this technology has today been used routinely in correcting the POPs. Afterit was introduced, the amount of anatomical relapse cases has decreased although it cannot be asserted with full confidence that performingsuch surgeries bears no risks. POP must be classified as a complicated hernial case, and it is imperative to evaluate not only thepost-curative anatomical effect but also the functional one. Therefore, this article's objective is to present a basis for rational analysis ofindividual surgical procedures used in conjunction with the reconstructive POP interventions and to map the future progress pertainingto this predicament. Statements published in this article have been based on a personal experience in practice.

Keywords: surgery of pelvic organ prolapse, pop, vaginal surgery, polypropylen mesch, endopelvic fascia, incontinence

Published: October 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krhovský M. Current surgical treatment options of pelvic organ prolapse. Urol. praxi. 2018;19(4):162-167. doi: 10.36290/uro.2018.079.
Download citation

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 501-506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Whiteside JL, Weber AM, Meyn LA, Walters MD. Risk factors for prolapse recurrence after vaginal repair. Am J Obstet gynecol 2004; 191: 1533-1538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Kearney R, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, et al. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle Injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 144-149. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Krofta L, Otčenášek M, Kašíková E, Feyereisl J. Pubococcygeus-puborectalis trauma after forceps delivery: evaluation of the levator ani muscle with 3D/4D ultrasound. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 2009; 20(10): 1175-1181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1717-1728. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. De Lancey JO. Functional anatomy of the female lower urinary tract and pelvic floor. Ciba Found Symp 1990; 151: 57-69. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. De Lancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary inkontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170(6): 1713-1720. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kotarinos R, Ariail A. Pelvic Floor Disorders, DVD-ROM, Published by Primal pictures Ltd.
  9. Petros P, Ulmsten U. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1993; 153: 1-93.
  10. Gynecare worldwide, division of Ethicon, Inc. a Johnson & Johnson company: Educational Overview CDROM about the Gynecare prolift Pelvic Floor Repair Systems devices.
  11. Halaška M, et al. Urogynekologie. Praha: Galén; 2004.
  12. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complication in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997; 1: 15-21. Go to original source...
  13. Papa Petros PE. The Female Pelvic Floor, Funciton, Dysfunction and Management according to the Integral Theory, Third Edition; 2-15.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.