Urol. praxi, 2011; 12(3): 173-179

Diagnosis and treatment of urolitiasis

MUDr.Aleš Petřík, Ph.D.
Urologické oddělení, Nemocnice České Budějovice

Ultrasonography is basic screening method in diagnostics of urinary stones. non-contrast CT is superior to IVU due to higher sensitivity

and specificity. Contrast study is optional in cases of planning of renal stones removal. Benefit of the CT study should be compared to

radiation hazard. Conservative treatment of ureteric stones is indicated as a primary method. Using of α1 blockers increase probability

of stone passage and accelerates the spontaneous passage of the stone. SWL and ureteroscopy are equal methods of stone removal

of all locations of ureteric stones. Ureteroscopy is more effective, but more invasive. SWL is indicated in renal stones less than 20 mm

in diameter. PNL is reserved for staghorn stones and in cases of stone location in worse anatomical locations. Laparoscopy end open

surgery is not indicated as a primary option.

Keywords: urinary stones, diagnosis, treatment, SWL, PNL, ureteroscopy

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petřík A. Diagnosis and treatment of urolitiasis. Urol. praxi. 2011;12(3):173-179.
Download citation

References

  1. Hradec E. Urolitiáza. Přehled dnešních poznatků o epidemiologii, patogenezi, metafylaxi a léčbě. Cas Lek Ces. 1989; 128(9): 257-261.
  2. Mates J, Křížek V. Urolithiasa. Praha: Státní zdravotnické nakladatelství, 1958.
  3. Zvara V, Revúsová V. Močové konkrementy. Bratislava: Veda - Vydavatelstvo SAV, 1988.
  4. Boyce CJ, Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Kim DH, Bruce RJ. Prevalence of urolithiasis in asymptomatic adults: objective determination using low dose noncontrast computerized tomography. J Urol. 2010; 183(3): 1017-1021. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kocvara R, Plasgura P, Petrik A, Louzensky G, Bartonickova K, Dvoracek J. A prospective study of nonmedical prophylaxis after a first kidney stone. BJU Int. 1999; 84(4): 393-398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Middleton WD, Dodds WJ, Lawson TL, Foley WD. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. Radiology. 1988; 167(1): 239-244. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Varma G, Nair N, Salim A, Marickar YM. Investigations for recognizing urinary stone. Urol Res. 2009; 37(6): 349-352. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Heidenreich A, Desgrandschamps F, Terrier F. Modern approach of diagnosis and management of acute flank pain: review of all imaging modalities. Eur Urol. 2002; 41(4): 351-362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan MS, Graham IR, et al. Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology. 1998; 52(6): 982-987. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Wu DS, Stoller ML. Indinavir urolithiasis. Curr Opin Urol. 2000; 10(6): 557-561. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(6): 1688-1693; discussion 93-94. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G, Gupta M. Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2009; 23(9): 1383-1385. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, Hein E, Hamm B, Romano V, et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30(1): 44-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Whitfield HN. The management of ureteric stones. Part I: diagnosis. BJU Int. 1999; 84(8): 911-915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Thomson JM, Glocer J, Abbott C, Maling TM, Mark S. Computed tomography versus intravenous urography in diagnosis of acute flank pain from urolithiasis: a randomized study comparing imaging costs and radiation dose. Australas Radiol. 2001; 45(3): 291-297. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(4): 927-933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, NolteErnsting CC, Takahashi S, Cohan RH. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(1): 4-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Holm-Nielsen A, Jorgensen T, Mogensen P, Fogh J. The prognostic value of probe renography in ureteric stone obstruction. Br J Urol. 1981; 53(6): 504-507. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Ueno A, Kawamura T, Ogawa A, Takayasu H. Relation of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to size. Urology. 1977; 10(6): 544-546. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Morse RM, Resnick MI. Ureteral calculi: natural history and treatment in an era of advanced technology. J Urol. 1991; 145(2): 263-265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Foster MC, Upsdell SM, O'Reilly PH. Urological myths. BMJ. 1990; 301(6766): 1421-1423. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Whitfield HN. The management of ureteric stones. Part II: therapy. BJU Int. 1999; 84(8): 916-921. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, Bradford TJ, Saint S, Wei JT, et al. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542): 1171-1179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Seitz C, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, Tiselius HG, Zwergel U. Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol. 2009; 56(3): 455-471. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar MM, Tuglu D, Ferhat M, Basar H. The comparison and efficacy of 3 different alpha1adrenergic blockers for distal ureteral stones. J Urol. 2005; 173(6): 2010-2012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Laerum E, Ommundsen OE, Gronseth JE, Christiansen A, Fagertun HE. Oral diclofenac in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent renal colic. A double-blind comparison with placebo. Eur Urol. 1995; 28(2): 108-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Moran ME, Abrahams HM, Burday DE, Greene TD. Utility of oral dissolution therapy in the management of referred patients with secondarily treated uric acid stones. Urology. 2002; 59(2): 206-210. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Musa AA. Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008; 40(1): 19-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Mohayuddin N, Malik HA, Hussain M, Tipu SA, Shehzad A, Hashmi A, et al. The outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal pelvic stone with and without JJ stent - a comparative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009; 59(3): 143-146. Go to PubMed...
  30. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007; 52(6): 1610-1631. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Ghoneim IA, El-Ghoneimy MN, El-Naggar AE, Hammoud KM, El-Gammal MY, Morsi AA. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and nonstented techniques. Urology. 2010; 75(1): 45-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Platonov MA, Gillis AM, Kavanagh KM. Pacemakers, implantable cardioverter/defibrillators, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: evidence-based guidelines for the modern era. Journal of endourology/Endourological Society. 2008; 22(2): 243-247. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar M, Tuglu D, Mert C, Basar H. Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urology. 2005; 66(6): 1160-1164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ. Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol. 2005; 174(2): 595-599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Madbouly K, El-Tiraifi AM, Seida M, El-Faqih SR, Atassi R, Talic RF. Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2005; 173(1): 127-130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, et al. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int. 2007; 79(2): 124-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol. 2008; 179(1): 194-197; discussion 7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, Gao S, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int. 2009 Mar 26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, Gao S. Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int. 2009; 103(1): 104-107. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Pishchalnikov YA, Neucks JS, VonDerHaar RJ, Pishchalnikova IV, Williams JC, Jr., McAteer JA. Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol. 2006; 176(6 Pt 1): 2706-2710. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Logarakis NF, Jewett MA, Luymes J, Honey RJ. Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2000; 163(3): 721-725. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Sorensen C, Chandhoke P, Moore M, Wolf C, Sarram A. Comparison of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia on the efficacy of the Doli 50 lithotriptor. J Urol. 2002; 168(1): 35-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Deliveliotis C, Giftopoulos A, Koutsokalis G, Raptidis G, Kostakopoulos A. The necessity of prophylactic antibiotics during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 1997; 29(5): 517-521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Adjunctive medical therapy with an alpha-1A-specific blocker after shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteral stones. Urol Int. 2009; 82(2): 166-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS, Jr. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005; 173(6): 1991-2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J, et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol. 2001; 166(6): 2072-2080. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am. 2007; 34(3): 409-419. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Elashry OM, Smith DS, McDougall EM, et al. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol. 1998; 159(3): 676-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Gupta NP, Singh DV, Hemal AK, Mandal S. Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2000; 163(1): 24-27. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Ghoneim IA, Ziada AM, Elkatib SE. Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. Eur Urol. 2005; 48(2): 296-302; discussion. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Petřík A, Alterová E, Fiala M, Novák J, Záťura F, Záťura F. Vliv stentingu na dezintegraci ureterolitiázy in vivo. Ces Urol. 2006; 10(1): 59-63.
  52. Petřík A, Záťura F, Beneš J. Vliv stentingu na dezintegraci ureterolitiázy in vitro. Ces Urol. 2004; 8(3): 59-63.
  53. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Straub M, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2010: Available from: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Urolithiasis%202010.pdf.
  54. Petřík A. Porovnání účinností extrakorporální litrotripse a ureteroskopie při primární terapii ureterolitiázy dolní třetiny ureteru. Cas Lek Cesk. 2007; 146(10): 776-780. Go to PubMed...
  55. De SM, Autorino R, Quarto G, Calabr? F, Damiano R, Giugliano F, et al. Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: A prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol. 2008; 54(1): 196-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  56. Falahatkar S, Moghaddam AA, Salehi M, Nikpour S, Esmaili F, Khaki N. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J Endourol. 2008; 22(11): 2513-2517. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Cevik I, Dillioglugil O, Akdas A, Siegel Y. Is stent placement necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for removal of impacted ureteral stones? J Endourol. 2010; 24(8): 1263-1267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  58. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De LRJ, Preminger G. Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: A systematic review. J Urol. 2008; 179(2): 424-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  59. Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Urol Research. 2009; 37(2): 83-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. Nabi G, Cook J, N DJ, McClinton S. Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2007; 334(7593): 572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  61. Cybulski PA, Joo H, Honey RJ. Ureteroscopy: anesthetic considerations. Urol Clin North Am. 2004; 31(1): 43-47, viii. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Semins MJ, Matlaga BR. Ureteroscopy during pregnancy. Indian J Urol. 2009; 25(3): 291-295. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR. The safety of ureteroscopy during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2009; 181(1): 139-143. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  64. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G, Mirciulescu V, Cauni V. Complications of 2 735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol. 2006; 20(3): 179-185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  65. Andankar MG, Maheshwari PN, Saple AL, Mehta V, Varshney A, Bansal B. Symptomatic small non-obstructing lower ureteric calculi: comparison of ureteroscopy and extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Postgrad Med. 2001; 47(3): 177-180.
  66. Pearle MS, Nadler R, Bercowsky E, Chen C, Dunn M, Figenshau RS, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2001; 166(4): 1255-1260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  67. Salem HK. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi. Urology. 2009; 74(6): 1216-1221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  68. Preminger GM. Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res. 2006; 34(2): 108-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  69. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol. 2005; 173(6): 2005-2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  70. Keeley FX, Gialas I, Pillai M, Chrisofos M, Tolley DA. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: the Edinburgh experience. BJU Int. 1999; 84(7): 765-769. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  71. Gaur DD, Trivedi S, Prabhudesai MR, Madhusudhana HR, Gopichand M. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 2002; 89(4): 339-343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  72. Goel A, Hemal AK. Upper and mid-ureteric stones: a prospective unrandomized comparison of retroperitoneoscopic and open ureterolithotomy. BJU Int. 2001; 88(7): 679-682. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  73. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Abukora F, Leeb K, Janetschek G. Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol. 2005; 19(3): 353-359. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  74. Hruza M, Schulze M, Teber D, Gozen AS, Rassweiler JJ. Laparoscopic techniques for removal of renal and ureteral calculi. J Endourol. 2009; 23(10): 1713-1718. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.