Urolog. pro Praxi, 2007; 8(5): 223-228

Modern pharmacotherapy of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

MUDr. Zbyněk Veselský Ph.D
Urocentrum Praha, s.r.o

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) together with a cataract is the most common non-malignant male diseases that are manager by an invasive procedure. The incidence is not obvious unequivocally due to the existence of different forms of the disease (histologic, asymptomatic – compensated obstruction, symptomatic). It is generally acceptable, that nearly 40 % of men in their forties are affected by some lower urinary tract symptoms. Because there are additional diseases of both sexes (and logically there is no prostate in women) that can cause identical symptoms the term lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) was introduced. In case of prostatic obstruction accurate terminology is LUTS/BHP (Coffey). Diagnostic workup is quite undemanding, however differential diagnosis is unbelievably broad. It is true that basis examination includes digital rectal exam, appropriate diagnosis (including a specific questionnaire) and urine analysis to rule out infection. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) level is important in patients perspective for a therapy of possibly diagnosed prostate cancer. Most units have the ability to quantify urinary flow by means of uroflowmetry (UFM) having in mind the limits of urine volume and data as such.

Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia, pharmacotherapy, indication

Published: October 23, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Veselský Z. Modern pharmacotherapy of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urol. praxi. 2007;8(5):223-228.
Download citation

References

  1. Denis L, Pagano F, Nonis A, Robertson C, Romano P, Boyle P. Double - blind, placebo controlled trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of mertricin in the treatment of BPH. Prostate. 37 (4), 1998, 246-252. Go to original source...
  2. Disantostefano RL, Biddle AK, Lavelle JP. The long - term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pharmacoeconomics, 24 (2), 2006, 171-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Fitzpatrick JM. The natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int., 97, 2006, Suppl 2, 3-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Hernandez C, Duran R, Jara J, Castano I, Moralejo M. Controlled-release doxazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis., 8 (4), 2005, 375-380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kaplan SA, McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Meehan AG, Lee MW, Noble WR, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM jr., Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) Research Group. Combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and a baseline total prostate volume of 25 ml or greater. J Urol., 175 (1), 2006, 217-220 (discussion item, 220-221). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Klotz LH. Androgen replacement and/or 5 alpha reductase inhibitors in aging men. Can J Urol., 13, 2006, Suppl 1. 44-45.
  7. Tarter TH, Vaughan ED jr. Inhibitors of 5 alpha -reductase in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Pharm Des., 12 (7), 2006, 775-783. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Veselský Z. Pygeum africanum v kauzální terapii benigní hyperplazie prostaty. JAMA-CS, 8 (4), 2000, 326.
  9. Veselský Z. Selektivita alfa-adrenergních receptorů v urologii. Remedia - Forum medicinae., 3 (4), 2001, 67-68.
  10. Wilt Tj, Mac Donald R, Rutks I. Tamsulosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (1), 2003: CD002081. Go to original source...




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.