Urolog. pro Praxi, 2003; 3: 90-93

Benigní nádory ledvin

MUDr. Alexandr Lamla, MUDr. Jaroslav Pernička
Urologická klinika FN a LF UP v Olomouci

Keywords: oncocytoma, angiomyolipoma, benign tumors.

Published: December 31, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lamla A, Pernička J. Benigní nádory ledvin. Urol. praxi. 2003;4(3):90-93.

Benigní nádory ledvin nepatří mezi nejčastější novotvary. Předoperační stanovení exaktní diagnózy je svízelné pro klinickou a radiologickou podobu s karcinomem. Při ultrasonografickém vyšetření a výpočetní tomografii nejsou přítomny charakteristické známky benigní léze, až histologické vyšetření odhalí původ nádoru. Článek poskytuje základní informace o klasifikaci, charakteristikách a léčbě benigních nádorů ledvin.

BENIGN RENAL TUMORS

Benign renal tumors are not frequently. Preoperative diagnosis is often difficult as they can mimic renal cell carcinoma clinically and radiologically. They often have not charakteristics features on ultrasound and computed tomography scanning which may enable their diagnosis preoperatively. Only histological examination will develop benign tumor. This article includes basic informations about characteristics, therapy and a new classification of renal benign tumors.

Download citation

References

  1. Baše J. Bilaterální multifokální onkocytomy ledviny. Rozhl. Chir., 75, 1996; 12: 573-575.
  2. Bellgrun A, deKernion JB. Renal Tumors. Walsh, et al., Campbell´s Urology, Sixth ed., WB Saunders Comp., 1982; 1055-1062.
  3. Cibas ES, Goss GA, Kulke MH, Demetri GD, Fletcher ChDM. Malignant Epitheloid Angiomyolipoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 2001; 25 (1): 121-126. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Delgado R, de Leon Bojorge B, Albores-Saavedra J. Atypical Angiomyolipoma of the Kidney. Cancer, 1998; 83: 1581-1592. Go to original source...
  5. Eble JN. Angiomyolipoma of Kidney. Seminars in Diag. Pathol., 1998; 15(1): 21-40.
  6. Fleischmann J, Huntley HN. Renal Tumors. Krane et al., Clinical Urology. J.B.Lippincot Comp., 1994; 369-371.
  7. Hes O, Michal M, Šulc M, Podlaha M, Zámečník M, Čuřík R, Mičulka P, Neubauer L, Kinkor Z, Pavlovský M. Onkocytom ledviny - morfologická variabilita 102 případů. Čes.-slov. Patol., 2001; 37 (2): 51-56.
  8. Hoffman DM, Gazelle GS, Seftel AD, Haaga JB, Resnick MI. Atlas of Urologic Imaging. Rose Tree Corporate Center, 1995; 33-37.
  9. Hora M, Hes O, Ouda Z, Michal M, Boudová L, Chudáček Z. Metanefrický adenom ledviny - kazuistika a přehled literatury. Čes Urol, 2001; 5: 15-19.
  10. Hora M, Ouda Z, Hes O, Michal M, Roušarová M. Onkocytom ledviny - nádor jednoznačně benigní. Čes Urol, 2000; 2: 30-32.
  11. Hruban T, Fiala R, Janík M, Záťura F. Onkocytom podkovovité ledviny. Čes Urol, 1999; 4: 13-15.
  12. Kawaciuk I. Nádory ledvin. Urologie, HH, 2000; 187-189.
  13. Križanac Š., Vranešič D., Oberman B. Oncocytomas of the Kidney. BJ Urol, 1987; 60: 189-192. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Michal M, Hes O, Mukenšnabl P. Nádory ledvin dospělého věku, Euroverlag, 2000; 10-12, 54-79, 98-112.
  15. Novák J. Nádory ledvin. Dvořáček a kol., Urologie, ISV Praha, 1998; (suppl.II): 937-939.
  16. Pitts WR, Kazam E, Gray G, Vaughan ED. Ultrasonography, Computerized Transaxial Tomography and Pathology of Angiomyolipoma of the Kidney: Solution to a Diagnostic Dilemma. J Urol., 1980; 124: 907-909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Wiliams R.D., Dreicer R. Renal Parenchymal Neoplasms. Tanagho E.A., McAninch W.J. Smiths General Urology, XIX. ed., Prentice-Hall Intern. Inc., 1995; 372-374.
  18. Wong K, Waters CM, Hershman MJ, Kaisary VA, Horner J. Angiomyolipoma of the kidney: a clinical enigma in diagnosis and management. Annals of the Royal College of Surg. Of Engl., 1992; 74: 144-148.
  19. Záťura F, Fiala R, Študent V, Pernička J, Kolombo I, Hrbek J. Onkocytom ledviny jako příčina výrazné anémie. Čes Urol, 1998; 1: 16-17.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.