Urol. praxi. 2020;21(1):6-10 | DOI: 10.36290/uro.2020.016

A urologist's approach to unretractable foreskin in children

MUDr. Jan Šarapatka, Ph.D., FEBU, MUDr. Jan Vrána, doc. MUDr. Oldřich Šmakal, Ph.D.
Urologická klinika Fakultní nemocnice a Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci

There can be a number of causes of unretractable foreskin. It can be due to a congenital narrowing of the foreskin (primary phimosis) or adhesions between the internal lamina of the prepuce and the glans penis. On physical examination, the general paediatrician should distinguish physiological causes of unretractable foreskin (primary phimosis, adhesions) from pathological ones (secondary phimosis). When preputial pathology is suspected, conservative treatment fails, or phimosis persists into puberty, it is advisable to refer the patient for specialist investigation. The treatment of phimosis can be initiated after the second or third year of life, or even earlier in the case of complicating factors. Conservative treatment with a corticoid ointment is the first choice; if it fails, circumcision can be considered. However, circumcision is necessary in secondary phimosis, particularly if balanitis xerotica obliterans is suspected. Complications associated with adhesions can be managed with dissolution. Acute conditions require immediate therapeutic intervention, preferably in the catchment facility.

Keywords: foreskin, adhesions, phimosis, paraphimosis, balanitis xerotica obliterans.

Published: April 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šarapatka J, Vrána J, Šmakal O. A urologist's approach to unretractable foreskin in children. Urol. praxi. 2020;21(1):6-10. doi: 10.36290/uro.2020.016.
Download citation

References

  1. Cold CJ, Taylor JR. The prepuce. Br J Urol. 1999; 83(Suppl. 1): 34-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Dinh MH, Fahrbach KM, Hope TJ. The Role of the Foreskin in Male Circumcision: An Evidence-Based Review. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology [online] 2011; 65(3): 279-283. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Sadler T. Langmanova lékařská embryologie. Grada Publishing, a.s., 2011. ISBN 9788024726403.
  4. Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J, 1949; 2: 1433. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Šmakal O. Fimóza - léčba v dětském věku. Pediatr. praxi 2003; 1: 30-31.
  6. Shahid SK. Phimosis in children. ISRN Urol. 2012. Go to original source...
  7. McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Pathologic and physiologic phimosis: approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician. 2007; 53(3): 445-448. Go to PubMed...
  8. McGregor TB, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Phimosis - a diagnostic dilemma? Can J Urol. 2005; 12(2): 2598-602.
  9. Drlík M, Dítě Z, Kočvara R. Nejčastější problémy v dětské andrologii. Urol. praxi 2013; 14(3): 109-113.
  10. Sedláček J, Kočvara R. Fimóza v dětském věku. Urol List 2007; 5(1): 34-36.
  11. Novák I, Fiala R. Fimóza - je obřízka řešením problémů s předkožkou? Urol. praxi 2009; 10(3): 190-193.
  12. Celis S, Reed F, Murphy F, Adams S, Gillick J, Abdelhafeez AH, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in children and adolescents: a literature review and clinical series. J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10(1): 34-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Trachta J, Kříž J. Fimóza u chlapců způsobená zánětem balanitis xerotica obliterans. Urol. praxi 2017; 18(4): 178-80. Go to original source...
  14. Zeman L, Rygl M. Balanitidy v dětském věku. Pediatr. praxi 2002; 3(3): 101-102.
  15. Liu J, et al. Is steroids therapy effective in treating phimosis? A meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2016; 48: 335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Zavras N, et al. Conservative treatment of phimosis with fluticasone proprionate 0.05 %: a clinical study in 1185 boys. J Pediatr Urol 2009; 5: 181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Raveenthiran V. The evolutionary saga of circumcision from a religious perspective. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 53(7): 1440-1443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. EAU guidelines for paediatric urology 2019: https://uroweb.org/guideline/paediatric-urology/#3_1.
  19. Arena S, et al. Modified partial circumcision for phimosis: Techniques and surgical outcomes. Annals of Pediatric Surgery 2018; 14. 151-156. Go to original source...
  20. Hotonu S, Mohamed A, Rajimwale A, Gopal M. Save the foreskin: Outcomes of preputioplasty in the treatment of childhood phimosis. Surgeon. 2019; 21: S1479-666X(19)30110-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.