Urol. praxi. 2017;18(3):129-132 | DOI: 10.36290/uro.2017.031

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, the experience after performed the first 50 procedures

doc. MUDr. Miloš Broďák, Ph.D., MUDr. Josef Košina, MUDr. Michal Balík, MUDr. Lukáš Holub,, MUDr. Jaroslav Pacovský, Ph.D., MUDr. Petr Hušek, FEBU
Urologická klinika FN a LF UK Hradec Králové

The authors present the first experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy according to carried out the first 50 cases.There were evaluated surgical results, complications, oncologic and functional results. The duration of surgeries was shortenedgradually and blood losses were minimal. Incontinence of urine and other adverse effects occurred minimally. Great majority ofpatients had postoperatively zero PSA level.

Keywords: robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, positive surgical margins, incontinence of urine followed radical prostatectomy

Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Broďák Josef Košina Michal Balík Lukáš Holub M, Pacovský Petr Hušek J. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, the experience after performed the first 50 procedures. Urol. praxi. 2017;18(3):129-132. doi: 10.36290/uro.2017.031.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2016 Aug 25. pii: S0302-2838(16)30470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Hora M, Babjuk M, Broďák M, Hanuš T, Jarolím L, et al. Stěžejní urologické operační výkony v urologii v ČR v letech 2009-2014. Ces Urol 2016; 20: 135-140
    3. Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Wallerstedt A, Wilderäng U, et al. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. Eur Urol. 2015; 68: 216-225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009; 104: 534-539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Wallerstedt A, Tyritzis SI, Thorsteinsdottir T, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2015; 67: 660-670. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Student V Jr, Vidlar A, Grepl M, Hartmann I, Buresova E, Student V. Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2016 Jun 6. pii: S0302-2838(16)30201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2016 Aug 25. pii: S0302-2838(16)30470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Schraml J, Broul M, Čekan M, Hrach K. Zhodnocení patologických výsledků z pohledu urologa po radikální prostatektomii z důvodu karcinomu prostaty i při "normálních" hodnotách PSA. Ces Urol 2013; 17: 118-123.
    9. Kumar A, Tandon S, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Patel VR. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2016; 10: 187-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Laviana AA, Williams SB, King ED, Chuang RJ, Hu JC. Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: the new standard? Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2015; 67: 47-53. Go to PubMed...
    11. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 1037-1063. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Rassweiler J, Frede T, Seemann O, Stock C, Sentker L. Telesurgical laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Initial experience. Eur Urol. 2001; 40: 75-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology. 1997; 50: 854-857. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    14. Young HH. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate. Being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases. 1905. J Urol. 2002; 167: 939-946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Kočárek J, Heráček M, Čermák F, Chmelík M, Matějková M. Roboticky asistovaná radikální prostatektomie - výsledky u 1 500 operací. Rozhl Chir. 2017; 96: 75-81. Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Urology for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.