Urol. praxi, 2015; 16(3): 113-115

Vasectomy - „new” option in male contraception

MUDr.Jindřich Šonský1, MUDr.Lukáš Bittner, FEBU, FECSM1,2, doc.MUDr.Robert Grill Ph.D., MHA1
1 Urologická klinika 3. LF UK a FNKV, Praha
2 Iscare IVF, Praha

Vasectomy is a highly effective method of contraception. With the development of no-scalpel technique, significant percentage of couples

worldwide rely on it. In 2012 the Czech Republic has changed its legal legislation restricting the use of vasectomy, which is easily

accessible now. Its advantages are its minimal invasiveness, low risk of complications and high reliability.

Keywords: vasectomy, sterilization, contraception, ductus deferens, Pearl index, vasectomy reversal

Published: June 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šonský J, Bittner L, Grill R. Vasectomy - „new” option in male contraception. Urol. praxi. 2015;16(3):113-115.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Vokurka M, Hugo J, et al. Velký lékařský slovník. Maxdorf 2004; 4.
    2. Monoski MA, et al. No-scalpel, no-needle vasectomy. Urology, 2006; 68: 9-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Zámečník L. Právní úprava vazektomie v České republice. Urol. Praxi, 2014; 15(3): 123-125.
    4. Glaskowsky PN. No-scalpel vasectomy. New York: EngenderHealth 2003: 60.
    5. Pearl R. Factors in human fertility and their statistical evaluation. Lancet, 1933; 222(5741): 607-611. Go to original source...
    6. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011; 83(5): 397-404. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Sterilization and its consequences. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1999; 54(12): 766-777. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. N. Engl J Med. 1997; 336(11): 762-767. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Ory EM, Hines RS, Cleland WH, Rehberg JF. Pregnancy after microinsert sterilization with tubal occlusion confirmed by hysterosalpingogram. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111(2 Pt 2): 508-510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A. European association of urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 61(1): 159-163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Patel AP, Lowe GJ, Zynger DL. Rethinking the value of sending vasectomy specimens for histologic examination: an analysis of arterial vasculature and failure to transect the vas deferens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014; 141(3): 360-366. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Whyte J, Sarrat R, Cisneros AI, Whyte A, Mazo R, Torres A, Lázaro J. The vasectomized testis. Int Surg. 2000; 85(2): 167-174. Go to PubMed...
    13. Moss DA, Travis CR, Moss JB, Stephens MB, Rollins A. Advantages of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique. Am Fam Physician. 2012; 85(12): 1-2.
    14. Griffin T, Tooher R, Nowakowski K, Lloyd M, Maddern G. Howlittle is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing. J Urol 2005; 174: 29-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    15. Hancock P, McLaughlin E. British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples (2002). J Clin Pathol 2002; 55: 812-816. Go to original source...
    16. Benger JR, Swami SK, Gingell JC. Persistent spermatozoa after vasectomy: a survey of British urologists. Br J Urol 1995; 76: 376-379.
    17. Herrel LA, Goodman M, Goldstein M, Hsiao W. Outcomes of microsurgical vasovasostomy for vasectomy reversal: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Urology. 2015; 85(4): 819-825. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Neubauer S, Engelmann UH. Microsurgical vasovasostomy in the age of modern reproduction medicine. A cost-benefit analysis. Urologe A. 2000; 39(3): 240-245. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    Return to the content


    Urology for Practice

    Madam, Sir,
    please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
    Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

    I declare:

    1. that I have met the above instruction
    2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited

    No
    Yes

    If your statement is not true, please be aware
    that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.