Urol. praxi, 2015; 16(1): 36-39

Metaphylaxy in urinary stones patients

Bc.Alena Buřičová1, Ing.Iva Brabcová, Ph.D.2, Mgr.Monika Kyselová, MBA1,2
1 Urologické oddělení, Nemocnice České Budějovice, a.s.
2 Katedra ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence, Zdravotně sociální fakulta Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích

The main aim of the research was to evaluate trend in the evidence of new diagnosed urinary stone patients, treated at department of urology,

Ceske Budejovice, and to evaluate, if the patients are informed sufficiently and if they are willing to change their life style. The survey,

using non-standardised questionnaire, was performed at the Department of Urology, Region Hospital Ceske Budejovice since January

2011 till December 2013. 123 patients, where first stone was diagnosed, were involved. Medical recodes was used for secondary analysis of

data of primary stone patients treated at the Department of Urology, Region Hospital Ceske Budejovice since 2009 till 2013. 644 patients

(471 men and 173 women) were found as patients treated for primary stone at this period. The higher incidence in men was confirmed. The

annual increase of new diagnosed cases was 129 patients (not statistically significant). Only half of the patients (53 %) follow the recommendation

of increased fluid intake of 2–3 litre per day and only third of the patients (35 %) follow the recommendation the restrictions. The

patients, who underwent invasive stone removal (ESWL, PNL or URS) are more likely to increase fluid intake than patients who passed stone

spontaneously. The willingness to change dietary regime is by affected quality of information about their drinking and dietary regime. The

motivation, including clear and detailed information of the patient by urologist and nurse is important for compliance.

Keywords: urolithiasis, urinary stones, methaphylaxis, prevention, patient

Published: March 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Buřičová A, Brabcová I, Kyselová M. Metaphylaxy in urinary stones patients. Urol. praxi. 2015;16(1):36-39.
Download citation

References

  1. Goldfarb DS, Arowojolu O. Metabolic Evaluation of Firstime and Recurrent Stone Formers. Urologic Clinics of North Amerika. 2013, is. 1, p. 13-20. DOI 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.09.007. Dostupné z: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0094014312000961. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Penniston KL, Nakada SY. Diet and Alternative Therapies in the Management of Stone Disease. Urologic Clinics of North Amerika. 2013, is. 1, p. 31-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.09.011. Dostupné z: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094014312001000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bartoníčková K. Metabolické vyšetření urolitiázy - význam, vyšetření, terapie a metafylaxe. Urologie pro praxi, 2004; 5(3): 121-124.
  4. Burešová E, Vidlář A, Hrabec M, Študent V. Urolitiáza - diagnostika a léčba. Urologie pro praxi, 2010; 11(4): 211-215.
  5. Kočvara R, Plasgura P, Petřík A, Louženský G, Bartoníčková K, Dvořáček J. A productive study of nonmedical prophylaxis after a first kidney stone. BJU International/[online]. 1999, vol. 84, issue 4, s. 393 - 398 [cit. 2014-09.03]. DOI/: 10.1046/j.1446-410x.1999.00216.x. Dostupné z: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00216.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Matoušková M a kol. Praktická urologie v kazuistikách. Praha: Asclepius, 2013.
  7. Kawaciuk I. Urologie. Praha: Galén, 2009.
  8. Hanuš T. Urologie. Praha: Triton, 2011.
  9. Sobotka R, Hanuš T. Příčiny a rizikové faktory vzniku urolitiázy. Urol. praxi, 2012; 13(1): 11-15.
  10. Petřík A. Diagnostika a terapie urolitiázy. Urol. praxi, 2011; 12(3): 173-179.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.