Urol. praxi, 2014; 15(3): 126-130

Quality of life and evaluation of erectile dysfunction after robotic radical prostatectomy

MUDr.Marek Broul, FECSM, MUDr.Jan Schraml
Klinika urologie a robotické chirurgie, Krajská zdravotní a.s., Masarykova nemocnice v Ústí nad Labem

Carcinoma of the prostate (CaP) is the third most common cancer in men in the Czech Republic and even the most common cancer in men

in the European Union. Along with the availability of PSA testing is also more frequent detection of earlier stages of CaP in younger men.

The main complications of surgical treatment of CaP is urine leakage and erectile dysfunction. To evaluate the severity of erectile dysfunction

several questionnaires are used. One of them is the International Index of Erectile Function. We evaluated the IIEF-5 questionnaire

that patients filled in the Center of Robotic Surgery and KZ, Masaryk´s Hospital in Ústí nad Labem. Patients filled out the questionnaire

on the day were indicated for prostate biopsy, before prostate biopsy, before robotic radical prostatectomy and then in the 3rd, 6th, 9th

and 12 month after the robotic radical prostatectomy. From our results, it is notable drop 5 IIEF score in the questionnaires, which were

filled by patients just before prostate biopsy.

biopsy of the prostate, robotic surgery, quality of life.

Keywords: erectile dysfunction, prostate cancer, questionnaire method, International Index of Erectile Function, IIEF 5, prostatectomy,

Published: July 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Broul M, Schraml J. Quality of life and evaluation of erectile dysfunction after robotic radical prostatectomy. Urol. praxi. 2014;15(3):126-130.
Download citation

References

  1. Witmore WF, Jr. Localized prostatic cancer: management and detection issue. Lancet 1994; 343: 1263-1267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Muir CS, Nectoux J, Staszewski J. The epidemiology of prostatic cancer. Geographical distributions and time-trends. Acta Oncol. 1991; 30: 133-1340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Uroweb.cz. Nádory prostaty. Epidemiologie a populační data ČR. Vývoj incidence a mortality v čase [online]. Dostupné z http://www.uroweb.cz/index.php?pg=dg-nadory-prostaty-epidemiologie-ceska-republika-vyvoj-incidence-mortalita [cit. 2013-04-26].
  4. Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2005; 48: 546-551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Stanford JL, Feng Z, Hamilton AS, et al. Urinary and sexual dysfuction after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. JAMA 2000; 283: 354-360. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Tal R, Alphs HH, Krebs P, et al. Erectile function recovery rate after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. J Sex Med, 2009; 6(9): 2538-2546. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Briganti A, Gallina A, Suardi N, et al. Predicting erectile function recovery after bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: a proposal of a novel preoperative risk stratification. J Sex Med, 2010; 7(7): 2521-2531. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Sutorý M. Erektilní dysfunkce po operacích v malé pánvi. Současné možnosti léčby - rehabilitace penisu. Urol. praxi, 2009; 10(6): 328-331.
  9. Zámečník L. Urologická problematika v sexuologii. In: Weiss P a kol. Sexuologie. Praha: Grada Publishing, a.s. 2010: s. 169-170.
  10. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822-830. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, et al. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11: 319-326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Braslis KG, Santa-Cruz C, Briskman AL, Soloway MS. Quality of life 12 months after radical prostatectomy. Br J Urol, 1995; 75: 48-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Fowler JF, Barry MJ, Lu-Yai GL, et al. Patient reported complications and follow-up treatment following radical prostatectomy: The national Medicare experience (1988-1990). Urology, 1993; 42: 622-629. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Declan GM, Kerg MI, Crowe H, et al. Operative details and oncological and functional outcomes of robotic-assited laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 month follow-up. Eur Urol. 2009; 55: 1358-1367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Chopra S, Srivastava A, Tewari A. Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard. Arab J Urol. 2010; 10: 23-21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Trinh QD, Sammon J, Maxine S, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol. 2012; 61: 679-685. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Broul M, Schraml J. Použití dotazníku IIEF 5 při hodnocení erektilní dysfunkce u pacientů s podezřením na karcinom prostaty, Urol. praxi, 2011; 12(4): 256-259.
  18. Fowler JF, Barry MJ, Lu-Yai GL, et al. Effect of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer on patient quality of life: results from Medicare survey. Urology, 1995; 45: 1007-1013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Fiala R, Záťura F. Kontinence a erektilní dysfunkce po radikální prostatektomii zjišťovaná korespondenční metodou. Čes Urol 1999; 4: 27-30.
  20. Jarolím L, Kawaciuk I, Hanek P, a kol. Funkční výsledky radikálních retropubických prostatektomií. Čes Urol 2005; 9(1): 20-25.
  21. Catalona WJ, Biggs SW. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Evaluation of results of 250 patients. J.Urol., 1990; 143: 539-543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Igel TC, Barrett DM, Segura JW, et al. Perioperative and postoperative complications from bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol, 1987; 137: 1189-1191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, Walsh PC. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: Influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J Urol, 1991; 145: 998-1002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Bates TS, Wright MPJ, Gillatt DA. Prevalence and impact of incontinence and impotence following total prostatectomy assessed anonymously by the ICS-Male Questionnaire. Eur.Urol., 1998; 33: 165-169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Naitoh J, Franklin J, Patel A, et al. Comparing results of patient-based and physician-based reported rates of urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. New Orleans, AUA 1997.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.