Urolog. pro Praxi, 2011; 12(1): 33-37

Clinical significance of histological findings following radiation therapy for prostate cancer

MUDr.Jaroslav Plachý1, MUDr.David Ondra1, MUDr.Antonín Večeřa2
1 Urologické oddělení, Uherskohradišťská nemocnice a. s., Uherské Hradiště
2 Oddělení patologie, Uherskohradišťská nemocnice a. s., Uherské Hradiště

The effectiveness of radiation therapy can be evaluated by monitoring the PSA level. Another option given to us is an ultrasound guided

prostate needle biopsy after radiotherapy with a time delay from radiotherapy. This work deals with an issue of clinical significance

of these histological findings. Histological specimens after radiotherapy can be obtained by the systemic biopsy with time delay from

radiotherapy, from the salvage prostatectomy specimen or transurethral prostatectomy. Evaluation of these findings is quite difficult.

Irradiated tissue undergoes continuous morphological changes that are partially inconspicuous. The presence of prostate carcinoma

in these specimen cannot confirm the vital tumor tissue with certainty. Even positive histological finding can later convert to negative.

PSA level and digital rectal exam remains the best ways to follow up the patient after radiotherapy. If we do not consider the indication

of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), we do not need to indicate the prostate biopsy. Nevertheless, the prostate biopsy is helpful

in prediction of disease progression before SRP. Evaluation of DNA ploidity and Gleason Score has significant predictive power after

salvage prostatectomy.

Keywords: radiotherapy, prostate carcinoma, biopsy, PSA, salvage prostatectomy

Published: February 25, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Plachý J, Ondra D, Večeřa A. Clinical significance of histological findings following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Urol. praxi. 2011;12(1):33-37.
Download citation

References

  1. Iczkowski KA. Effect of Radiotherapy on Non-neoplastic and malignant prostate. The Open Pathology Journal, 2009; 3: 64-73. Go to original source...
  2. Cheng L, Sebo TJ, Slezak J, et al. Predictors of survival for prostate carcinoma patients treated with salvage radical prostatectomy after radiation therapy. Cancer 1998; 83(10): 2164-2171. Go to original source...
  3. Prestidge BR, Kaplan I, Cox RS, Bagshaw MA. The clinical significance of positive post-irradiation prostate biopsy without metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 24: 403-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Crook JM, Bahadur YA, Perry GA, et al. Radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results of systematic biopsies for 479 patients. J Urol. 1998; 159(suppl): 64. Go to PubMed...
  5. Zapatero A, Minguez R, Nieto S, et al. Post-treatment prostate biopsies in the era of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy: what can they teach us?. Eur Urol. 2009; 55(4): 902-909. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Prestidge BR, Hoak DC, Grimm PD, et al. Posttreatment biopsy results following interstitial brachytherapy in early-stage prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 37(1): 31-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Vachalovský V, Dvořáček J. Terapie lokálně pokročilého adenokarcinomu prostaty. In: Dvořáček J, Babjuk M, et al. Onkourologie. 1. vyd. Praha: Galén, 2005: 346-364.
  8. Kubeš J. Postavení radioterapie v léčbě karcinomu prostaty. Postgrad. medicína 2010; 12(3): 300-304.
  9. Roach M, Waldman F, Pollack A. Predictive Models in External Beam Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Cancer 2009; 115(13 Suppl): 3112-3120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Novotvary 2007. Praha. ÚZIS ČR, NOR ČR 2010, 262. Available at: http://www.uzis.cz/system/files/novot2007.pdf.
  11. Bolla M, Gonzales D, Warde P, et al. Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 295-300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 103-108. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Roach M, Lu J, Pilepich MV, et al. Predicting longterm survival and the need for hormonal therapy: a meta-analysis of RTOG prostate cancer trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47: 617-627. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Cohen JH, Eastham J, Macchia RJ. Outcomes following negative prostate biopsy for patients with persistent desease after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Int Braz J Urol 2010; 36(1): 44-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Zelefsky MJ, Reuter VE, Fuks Z, et al. Influence of local tumor control on distant metastases and cancer related mortality after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2008; 179(4): 1368-1373. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Hanks E, et al. RTOG protocol 92-02: A phase III trial of the use of long term total androgen suppression following adjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physm 2000; 48(3): Suppl. Go to original source...
  17. Pilepich MW, Winter K, John MJ, et al. Phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 1243-1252. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Heidenreich A, Richter S, Thüer D, et al. Prognostic parameters, complications, and oncologic and functional outcome of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after 21st century radiotherapy. Eur Urol. 2010; 57(3): 437-443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Vance W, Tucker SL, de Crevoisier R, et al. The predictive value of 2-year posttreatment biopsy after prostate cancer radiotherapy for eventual biochemical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67(3): 828-833. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Solberg A, Haugen OA, Viset T, et al. Residual Prostate cancer in patients treated with endocrine Therapy with or Without Radical Radiotherapy: A Side Study of the SPCG-7 Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Jun 30. [Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Heidenreich A, Bolla M, Joniau S, et al. Guidelines on prostate cancer 2010. In: EAU Guidelines, edition presented at the 25th EAU Annual Congress, Barcelona2010. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Prostate%20Cancer%202010%20June%2017th.pdf.
  22. Cheng L, Cheville JC, Bostwick DG. Diagnosis of prostate cancer in needle biopsies after radiation therapy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23(10): 1173-1183. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Stone NN, Stock RG, Unger P, et al. Biopsy results after real-time ultrasound-guided transperineal implants for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer. J Endourol. 2000; 14(4): 375-380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Merrick GS, Butler WM, Galbreath RW, et al. Relationship between percent positive biopsies and biochemical outcome after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate gland. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 52(3): 664-673. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, Vicini FA, et al. Percentage of positive biopsy cores as predictor of clinical outcome in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy. J Urol. 2002; 168(5): 1994-1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Král M, Študent V, Kurfürstová D, et al. Gleasonovo skóre v biopsii a po radikální prostatektomii - změny po konferenci ISUP 2005 a význam pro urologa. Urolog. pro Praxi 2007; 8(4): 173-178.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.