Urolog. pro Praxi, 2005; 6: 260-263

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN THE RELATIONSHIP TO UROLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES

RNDr. PhDr. Martina Ondrušová2, prof. MUDr. Dalibor Ondruš DrSc1, doc. MUDr. Ivan Pleško DrSc2
1 Onkologická klinika LF UK, Onkologický ústav sv. Alžbety, Bratislava
2 Národný onkologický register SR, NOÚ, Bratislava

Gradual increase of cases and deaths from malignant diseases during the previous century resulted in their dominant position in the overall mortality and morbidity of the populations of developed countries. This situation led to the use of epidemiological methods in the field of non-infectious, mainly malignant diseases, applied in the past with success in the study and control of infectious diseases. The aim of this paper is to provide the urologists and other clinicians with the most common epidemiological indicators as well as their adequate use in the study urological malignancies.

Keywords: Key words: epidemiology, urological malignancies, incidence, mortality.

Published: January 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ondrušová M, Ondruš D, Pleško I. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL INDICATORS IN THE RELATIONSHIP TO UROLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES. Urol. praxi. 2005;6(6):260-263.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahlbom A, Norell S. Introduction to Modern Epidemiology. 2. ed. Sweden: Epidemiology Resources Inc., 1990; ISBN 0-917227-06-9, s. 4-34.
  2. Boyle P, Parkin DM. Statistical methods for registries. In: Jensen OM, Parkin, DM, Maclennan R, et al. (eds): Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. IARC, Lyon 1991: 126-158.
  3. Jedrychowski W, Maugeri U. Epidemiologic methods in studying chronic diseases. 1. ed. Poland: Int. Center for Studies and research in Biomedicine in Luxemburg, 2000: 1-77.
  4. Kmety E, a kol. Epidemiológia. Osveta, Martin 1983; s. 185. ISBN 70-084-83.
  5. Kolektiv autorů: Novotvary 2002 ČR, ÚZIS ČR a NOR ČR, Praha 2005.
  6. Maclennan R. Items of patient information which may be collected by registries. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, Maclennan R, et al. (eds): Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. IARC, Lyon 1991: 43-63.
  7. Parkin DM, Hakulinen T. Analysis of survival. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, Maclennan R, et al. (eds): Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. IARC, Lyon 1991; ISBN 92 832 11952, s. 159-176.
  8. Pleško I. Aktuálne problémy štúdia epidemiológie nádorov. Lek. Obzor, 30, 1981; č. 4: 211-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Pleško I. Epidemiológia zhubných nádorov. In.: Jurga Ľ, a kol. Klinická onkológia a rádioterapia. SAP, Bratislava 2000: 70-89.
  10. Pleško I, a kol. Incidencia zhubných nádorov v Slovenskej republike 2002. Národný onkologický register SR, Bratislava 2005 (v tlači).
  11. Santos Silva, Dos I. Cancer Epidemiology: Principles and Methods. 2. ed. IARC, Lyon 1999: 1-442.
  12. Široký P, a kol. Principy, metody a využití Národního onkologického registru. Klin. Onkol. 12, 1999; zvláštní číslo: 1-40.
  13. Ticháček B. Základy epidemiológie. Galén, Praha 1997; 230 s. ISBN 80-85824-53-1.
  14. Tomatis L. Trends in cancer epidemiology. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., 3, 1983; č. 3: 257-260.
  15. Žáček A. Metody studia zdraví a nemocí v populaci. 2. ed., Avicenum, Praha 1984: 150-163.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.